All news

Anthropic says new measures cut data harvesting from Claude by competitors by 90-99%

Prepared by Sintelligent with the help of SI. Published in SI: . Updated: .

Labs are building defences against having their models copied through their answers.

Anthropic described three measures against distillation, the training of other models on Claude's answers: controlling access to reasoning (including barring new API accounts from editing earlier context), a two-stage classifier for extraction requests with a false-positive rate below 0.1%, and stricter limits, account bans and charges for blocked requests in cases of clear abuse. According to the company's preliminary data, the volume of data collected by distillers fell by 90-99% and the number of reasoning tokens extracted by 10 to 100 times or more. Anthropic notes it has not yet seen "a highly sophisticated and persistent attempt" to circumvent them and expects a "cat-and-mouse game"; some developers had to update their integrations, and false positives are rare. The figures are the company's own.

History

Dispute over distilling other labs' models

7 events
  1. Anthropic says new measures cut data harvesting from Claude by competitors by 90-99%Open now
  2. OpenAI says it stopped a campaign to "siphon off" its models' reasoning: the core is linked to people from Moonshot AI
  3. Jensen Huang: model distillation is "competition," not theft
  4. China opens a review of DeepSeek and Moonshot: according to Anthropic, they ran tens of millions of queries through Claude, including police data
  5. Y Combinator chief Garry Tan: American open labs should also be allowed to "distill" other models
  6. Anthropic: Alibaba, Moonshot and DeepSeek siphoned off Claude's knowledge through almost 200 million queries
  7. US intelligence agencies accuse DeepSeek, Moonshot, Alibaba and three other Chinese companies of mass "extraction" of American SI models
Follow on Telegram